Impact: The Varieties of Religious Experience

The Man Who Studied Everything He Suffered

William James was not a detached observer of psychological crisis. He had lived inside one. In his late twenties, he went through what he later described — obliquely, in the third person, buried in these very lectures — as a period of near-total spiritual collapse. He wrote about encountering a vision of a catatonic patient in an asylum and being overwhelmed by the thought that he could become that man, that there was nothing separating him from that vacancy. The experience shattered whatever confidence he had in the stability of the self. He came out the other side, eventually, through an act of will — choosing to believe in free will as his first free act — and that experience of disintegration and recovery never left him.

He was also, by the time he delivered these lectures, one of the most famous intellectuals in America. He had published The Principles of Psychology in 1890, a two-volume landmark that essentially built the discipline of American psychology from the ground up. He had coined the phrase 'stream of consciousness.' He was the brother of Henry James, the novelist, and their letters to each other — William telling Henry to write more clearly, Henry telling William his philosophy read like a novel — are among the great literary correspondences in American history. The Gifford Lectures at Edinburgh were a prestigious honor, and James was the right person to deliver them: someone who understood science, had read the mystics, and had personally felt the floor give way.

What James Actually Did in This Book

The premise of The Varieties of Religious Experience is deceptively simple: instead of arguing about religious doctrine, James would study religious experience itself — the raw, first-person, felt encounters that people across all traditions describe as encounters with the divine or the transcendent. He gathered testimony compulsively: conversion narratives, accounts of sudden illuminations, descriptions of what he called 'the sick soul' and 'healthy-mindedness,' reports of mystical states, letters from ordinary people who had felt, once, that everything was unified and suffused with love. He had help — he acknowledges in his preface a debt to Edwin D. Starbuck of Stanford, who gave him a large archive of manuscript material on conversion experiences.

The result is a book organized not around theological argument but around psychological types. James identifies the 'once-born' temperament — people who move through life with a natural buoyancy, for whom religion is an expansion of joy — and the 'twice-born,' people who have been broken first and must rebuild. He writes a lecture on 'The Sick Soul' that is one of the most honest accounts of depression and existential dread in any non-fiction book of the period. He writes on conversion, mysticism, saintliness, and prayer, always asking the same question: what does this experience do to the person who has it, and does it make them more alive or less? This is, as James is careful to note, a deliberately empirical frame. He is not asking whether the object of religious experience is real. He is asking whether the experience itself produces real effects.

A Sensation on Two Continents

Unlike many philosophical works, The Varieties of Religious Experience was an immediate and substantial success. It was published by Longmans in 1902 and went through multiple printings within years. James's reputation meant the lectures were already anticipated; the book's accessibility — he had deliberately loaded it with concrete examples and personal testimony rather than abstract formulas, as he explains in the preface — meant it reached far beyond academic readers. Clergy read it. Novelists read it. Psychologists read it. People who had themselves had religious experiences and never seen them taken seriously by any intellectual framework read it and felt recognized.

The reception was not uniformly warm from every direction. Some religious thinkers were unsettled by James's refusal to adjudicate the metaphysical question — his pragmatist conclusion that religious experiences are 'true' insofar as they are fruitful felt, to some, like a polite evasion of whether God was actually there. Some scientists found the whole enterprise too credulous. But the middle ground — the enormous territory of educated readers who were neither committed materialists nor orthodox believers — received the book as a kind of liberation. Here, finally, was a first-rate mind treating the interior life of faith as a legitimate object of inquiry rather than an embarrassment.

What the Book Is Really About

The deepest subject of The Varieties of Religious Experience is not religion. It is consciousness — specifically, the question of what lies at the edges of ordinary waking awareness and what happens when those edges dissolve. James was fascinated by the subliminal self, by hypnosis, by what he elsewhere called 'the fringe' of thought: the penumbra of feeling and association that surrounds every clear idea. Religious experience, in his account, is largely an experience of that fringe becoming the foreground. The mystic, the convert, the person suddenly overwhelmed by the sense that everything is one — these are people in whom the normal filtering mechanisms of consciousness have, briefly or permanently, loosened.

This is why the book remains compelling to readers with no particular interest in religion at all. James is essentially describing altered states of consciousness more than a century before that phrase existed, and he is doing so with a combination of empirical precision and genuine philosophical humility that most later writers on the subject have not matched. His chapter on mysticism, for instance, identifies four characteristics of mystical states — ineffability, noetic quality, transiency, and passivity — that remain the most useful taxonomy anyone has produced. He arrived at these by reading everything: Christian mystics, Sufi poets, accounts from nitrous oxide experiments, reports from people who had simply, once, looked at a field and felt that everything was perfectly all right.

The Long Shadow

The cultural footprint of The Varieties of Religious Experience is vast and often invisible, the way foundational books tend to become. Carl Jung read it carefully and credited James's work on religious experience as an influence on his own psychology of the unconscious. The founders of Alcoholics Anonymous drew directly on James's account of conversion and the 'twice-born' self — the idea that hitting bottom and being rebuilt through surrender to a higher power was a recognizable psychological pattern, not just a theological claim. Bill Wilson, one of AA's founders, reportedly called James 'one of the founders' of the movement. That is an extraordinary thing for a book of academic lectures to have accomplished.

Later in the twentieth century, the book fed into the broader counterculture's interest in mystical experience. Aldous Huxley, writing The Perennial Philosophy and later The Doors of Perception, was working in a tradition James had opened. The humanistic psychology of Abraham Maslow — particularly his work on 'peak experiences' — is essentially a secular translation of James's framework. The contemporary neuroscience of religious and mystical experience, now a genuine research field, still tends to begin its literature reviews with James, because he described the phenomenon so carefully before anyone had brain imaging to work with.

Reading It Now

What makes The Varieties of Religious Experience still worth reading — not just worth citing — is James's prose and his intellectual temperament. He writes with warmth and without condescension. When he quotes a letter from someone describing a moment of sudden religious illumination, he is not presenting a case study; he is presenting a human being. His capacity to take seriously experiences that his scientific training might have licensed him to dismiss is not naivety — it is a principled methodological choice, and he argues for it explicitly. He believed, as he says in the preface, that a large acquaintance with particulars often makes us wiser than the possession of abstract formulas, however deep. That conviction gives the book its texture.

There is also something quietly radical about the book's central move: refusing to let either materialist science or institutional religion own the question of what religious experience means. In an era when those two positions seem to be the only ones on offer, James's pragmatist third way — ask what the experience does, not just what it is — feels less like a historical artifact and more like a suggestion that remains ahead of us. The questions he was asking in Edinburgh in 1901 have not been answered. They have barely been improved upon.

Further Reading & Resources

Related Works in Our Library