Impact: The Scarlet Letter

Who Was Nathaniel Hawthorne

Hawthorne was haunted by his own ancestry in a way that shaped almost everything he wrote. One of his forebears, John Hathorne, was a judge at the Salem witch trials — not a bystander, but an active prosecutor who showed no remorse. Nathaniel added the 'w' to the family name, reportedly to distance himself from that legacy, though he could never quite escape it. He grew up in Salem, Massachusetts, in near-poverty after his father died of yellow fever, and spent years in relative isolation after college, reading obsessively and writing stories that almost no one bought.

By the time he wrote The Scarlet Letter he was in his mid-forties and had spent three years working as a surveyor at the Salem Custom House — a political appointment he lost when the Whigs came to power in 1849. He used that humiliation as the pretext for the novel's famous introductory essay, 'The Custom-House,' in which he imagines finding Hester Prynne's story in a pile of old documents in the attic. The framing device is a small masterpiece of sly self-presentation: Hawthorne positioning himself as a man recovered from government drudgery, now free to tell the truth. His mother died while he was writing the book. He reportedly finished the final chapters weeping.

A Sensation From the First Page

The Scarlet Letter was not a book that had to wait for the world to catch up. It sold out its first print run of 2,500 copies within ten days of publication in March 1850. A second edition appeared within weeks. Contemporary reviewers called it powerful, original, and deeply felt — though several found its moral atmosphere oppressive, and some religious readers were offended by its apparent sympathy for an adulteress. One critic complained that it was 'a dirty story.' Hawthorne's friend Herman Melville, who had not yet written Moby-Dick, read it and was electrified, writing an ecstatic review that compared Hawthorne to Shakespeare.

The book made Hawthorne's reputation overnight and remains, commercially and critically, the work he is remembered for. He wrote three more novels — The House of the Seven Gables, The Blithedale Romance, and The Marble Faun — but none of them lodged in the culture the way The Scarlet Letter did. It entered the American high school curriculum and has largely never left, which is either a tribute to its power or evidence that we enjoy making teenagers read about adultery and decide how they feel about it.

What the Book Is Really About

The plot, stripped bare, is simple: Hester Prynne has a child out of wedlock in Puritan Boston, refuses to name the father, and is condemned to wear a scarlet 'A' for adultery on her chest for the rest of her life. The secret father is Arthur Dimmesdale, a revered minister who lets Hester bear the punishment alone. Her absent husband, Roger Chillingworth, arrives in Boston and devotes himself to destroying Dimmesdale from the inside. That's roughly it for external action. The novel's real drama is interior — it is a book about what shame does to people over time, and whether guilt privately carried is better or worse than punishment publicly administered.

Hawthorne opens the book with a prison and a rose-bush growing beside it — one of the most economical symbolic openings in American fiction. The prison represents the inevitable machinery of social punishment; the rose-bush, rooted at the threshold, represents something that refuses to be killed by proximity to human cruelty. The novel never resolves the tension between those two images. Hester endures, transforms, and becomes something close to admirable. Dimmesdale collapses inward. Chillingworth, pursuing vengeance, becomes the book's truest monster — a man who started as a victim and chose to become something else. Hawthorne is not interested in easy verdicts.

The scarlet letter itself does something remarkable over the course of the narrative: it changes meaning. Hester embroiders it so beautifully that it ceases to look like a mark of shame. Townspeople begin to read the 'A' as standing for 'Able.' Later there are suggestions it might mean 'Angel.' The symbol that was meant to fix and define her becomes unstable, polyvalent, almost impossible to pin down. Hawthorne, whose great subject was the gap between surface appearances and hidden reality, was clearly delighted by this. The letter does not mean what the Puritans intended. It never does.

Puritans and the Problem of Judgment

Hawthorne is often described as critical of Puritanism, and that is true, but it is not the whole truth. He understood the Puritan project — the genuine, serious attempt to build a society ordered by conscience — and he took it seriously enough to show why it failed. The opening chapter observes, with quiet devastation, that every utopian colony immediately sets aside land for two things: a cemetery and a prison. The impulse to punish is not incidental to the project of building a better society; it is, Hawthorne suggests, foundational to it. Civilization and its discontents, sixty years before Freud.

What makes the Puritans in the novel more than cardboard villains is that some of them change their minds about Hester. They come to respect her. The community's judgment is not permanent, and Hawthorne gives it credit for being capable of revision. What cannot be revised is the damage already done — to Hester's daughter Pearl, raised in the shadow of her mother's mark; to Dimmesdale, who cannot forgive himself; to Chillingworth, who lets revenge consume him entirely. The novel is not a simple argument against judgment. It is an argument about the cost of judgment, and about who ends up paying that cost.

Cultural Footprint

Few symbols in American literature have proven as durable and adaptable as the scarlet letter. The 'A' has been invoked in discussions of everything from McCarthyism (the public shaming of suspected Communists) to HIV stigma to the internet's capacity for mob humiliation. When Jon Ronson wrote his 2015 book about social media pile-ons, So You've Been Publicly Shamed, the ghost of Hester Prynne was present on almost every page, even when she went unmentioned. The novel's central image — a community forcing an individual to wear their transgression visibly, permanently — has proven almost infinitely transferable.

The book has been adapted for stage, film, opera, and television multiple times, with wildly varying fidelity to the source. The most notorious adaptation is probably the 1995 film starring Demi Moore, which the production company felt the need to advertise as 'freely adapted from the novel' — a rare case of a studio essentially warning audiences that the film and the book have almost nothing to do with each other. The novel also exerts a quieter influence on American literary fiction: Toni Morrison, who wrote brilliantly about Hawthorne's relationship to race and darkness in her critical work Playing in the Dark, engaged with his legacy throughout her career. The scarlet letter lives somewhere in the DNA of The Handmaid's Tale, Margaret Atwood's vision of a theocratic America in which women are defined entirely by their reproductive and sexual status.

Why It Still Matters

There is a version of The Scarlet Letter that students encounter as a morality play with a clear message — Puritans bad, individual freedom good — and it is the least interesting version of the book. Hawthorne was not writing a pamphlet. He was genuinely troubled by the questions he raised, and the novel's power comes from the fact that he does not resolve them cleanly. Hester is the closest thing the book has to a hero, but Hawthorne also makes her complicit in Dimmesdale's suffering by protecting his secret. Dimmesdale is a coward, but his self-torment is rendered with enough psychological precision that you cannot simply dismiss him. Even Chillingworth, the villain, gets a moment near the end where he admits he could have chosen differently.

What the book does better than almost any other American novel of its era is dramatize the difference between public and private conscience — between the self we show the community and the self we live with alone. That gap has not narrowed since 1850. If anything, in an age when every transgression can be screenshot and shared, the question Hawthorne was asking feels more urgent than ever: what does public shaming actually accomplish, and at what cost, and for whom? Hester Prynne has been standing on that scaffold for 175 years. She is still worth listening to.

Further Reading & Resources

Related Works in Our Library