Impact: The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

The Man Who Wrote It Dying

Robert Louis Stevenson spent most of his adult life trying not to die. He was born in Edinburgh in 1850 with lungs that never worked properly — tuberculosis shadowed him from childhood, and he was in and out of convalescence for decades. He wrote Treasure Island, Kidnapped, and Jekyll and Hyde between medical crises, often bedridden, often in climates chosen for their supposed therapeutic benefits: the south of France, the Swiss Alps, eventually Samoa, where he died in 1894 at forty-four.

Edinburgh itself shaped him in ways that matter for Jekyll and Hyde. The city is literally built on top of itself — the Old Town sits above a network of buried streets and vaults, and the respectable New Town Georgian facades face, just across a valley, the cramped medieval warrens of the Old Town. Stevenson knew the story of Deacon Brodie, a respectable Edinburgh cabinet-maker and town councillor who was hanged in 1788 for a series of burglaries he had committed by night. Brodie had even built his own gallows. Stevenson wrote a play about Brodie years before Jekyll and Hyde. The city was already giving him the idea.

He was also a man who knew something about living in two registers. Raised by a strict Calvinist father, he spent his young adulthood in deliberate rebellion — haunting the slums of Edinburgh, consorting with prostitutes, abandoning the engineering career his family had planned. The guilt and the freedom, the respectable drawing room and the dark street just outside: Jekyll and Hyde did not come from nowhere.

An Instant Sensation

The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was published in January 1886, priced at a shilling, and it was a hit almost immediately. It was the kind of book Victorian readers pressed into each other's hands. Gladstone reportedly stayed up late to finish it. The Archbishop of York cited it in a sermon. American sales were even more extraordinary — pirated editions proliferated because the U.S. had no copyright agreement with Britain, which meant the book spread quickly and widely even if Stevenson saw little of the money.

Within two years, the American actor Richard Mansfield was performing a stage adaptation in which his transformation from Jekyll to Hyde — achieved through makeup, lighting, and what audiences described as a terrifying physical contortion — became one of the great theatrical sensations of the era. When the Jack the Ripper murders began in London in 1888, a woman actually wrote to the police suggesting Mansfield himself might be the killer, on the grounds that no ordinary man could portray such evil so convincingly. He canceled the run shortly after.

The book's success was, in retrospect, almost overdetermined. It arrived at a precise cultural moment: Victorian England was deep in anxiety about what lay beneath its own surfaces — beneath the suits and the manners and the Reform Club memberships. Jekyll and Hyde handed that anxiety a perfect shape.

What the Book Is Actually About

Here is the thing most people who know the story without reading it tend to get wrong: Hyde is not Jekyll's evil twin. Hyde is Jekyll's suppressed self — the part of him that wants what it wants without apology. Jekyll is not a good man corrupted. He is, from the start, a man who has spent his entire life performing goodness while privately resenting the performance. 'I was no more myself when I laid aside restraint and plunged in shame,' Jekyll writes in his final confession, 'than when I laboured, in the eye of day, at the furtherance of knowledge or the relief of sorrow and suffering.' The horror of the book is not that evil exists. It is that respectable men contain it and enjoy it.

Stevenson also does something structurally subtle that gets lost in adaptations. The reader never meets Jekyll and Hyde together, never sees the transformation directly. The story is told almost entirely through the lawyer Utterson — a man described on the first page as 'cold, scanty and embarrassed in discourse; backward in sentiment; lean, long, dusty, dreary and yet somehow lovable,' who drinks gin alone at home to punish himself for liking good wine. Utterson is the book's true center: a man of deep repressions investigating a mystery that is, at its core, about repression. The horror accumulates at a remove, through documents and testimonies and a door that no one quite wants to explain.

That door — blistered, distained, equipped with neither bell nor knocker — is one of Victorian literature's great images. It opens onto the laboratory where Hyde lives. It is the back entrance to Jekyll's respectable townhouse. The geography is the metaphor: the respectable front, the shameful back, connected all along.

The Word Freud Didn't Invent

Sigmund Freud published The Interpretation of Dreams in 1899, thirteen years after Jekyll and Hyde. The concepts that Freud would systematize — the id, the superego, repression, the unconscious as a force that pushes back against civilization's demands — are already present in Stevenson's novella in narrative form. Stevenson got there first, not as theory but as story, which may be why it penetrated so much deeper into the culture.

The book also anticipates something more specifically Victorian that scholars have written about extensively: the question of what, exactly, Jekyll and his respectable male friends are hiding. The novella is almost entirely populated by bachelor gentlemen who guard each other's secrets with great delicacy and never quite say what they mean. When Utterson suspects something disgraceful about Hyde's hold over Jekyll, his instinct is not to expose it but to manage it quietly. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and others have read the book as saturated with the particular anxiety of men who have things to hide in an era when Oscar Wilde was two years away from arrest. Whether or not Stevenson intended this reading, the text supports it — and it gives the book a layer that straightforward 'good versus evil' readings miss entirely.

Cultural Footprint

The adaptations are almost beyond counting. There have been over a hundred film versions, beginning in the silent era — a 1908 Selig Polyscope Company short is among the earliest surviving American narrative films. The most celebrated Hollywood version is the 1931 Rouben Mamoulian film with Fredric March, who won the Academy Award for Best Actor for playing both roles. The 1941 version starred Spencer Tracy, who reportedly wanted to play Hyde without heavy makeup, on the theory that the monster was always there in the face. Both approaches are true to different aspects of the book.

The story has been retold with the genders swapped, transplanted to modern New York, reimagined as a musical (the Broadway production ran for 1,543 performances), and used as the structural spine of everything from The Nutty Professor to The Incredible Hulk. The phrase 'Jekyll and Hyde' appears in legal judgments, psychiatric literature, newspaper editorials, and everyday speech. It is one of a very small number of fictional coinages — alongside 'Frankenstein's monster' and 'Kafkaesque' — that have become tools of thought rather than merely references to stories.

Stevenson could not have anticipated any of this. He thought of Jekyll and Hyde as a 'crawler' — a genre entertainment. He was faintly embarrassed by how much more money it made than his literary work. He would probably be astonished that it's still being read, taught, and argued about a hundred and forty years later.

Why It Still Matters

The novella is short — you can read it in two to three hours — and it moves with the efficiency of a nightmare. Stevenson does not waste a sentence. The prose in Jekyll's final confession, as he describes watching his own hand transform unbidden while sitting in Regent's Park, achieves a register of genuine terror: the horror of the body becoming a stranger, of the will losing its grip on the self. This is not dated Gothic machinery. It is a description of something people still recognize.

What the book keeps asking, in its quiet, lawyerly way, is whether the division it describes is a tragedy or simply an accurate account of what human beings are. Jekyll believes, right up until the end, that his two selves are genuinely separate — that the good doctor and the murderous Hyde are different men who happen to share a body. The book does not entirely agree. Hyde shrinks as Jekyll suppresses him; but he grows stronger the more Jekyll indulges him, and by the end Jekyll cannot hold him back at all. The self you act on becomes more real. The self you suppress becomes more dangerous. That is not a Victorian idea. That is the situation.

Read it for the atmosphere — the gas-lit London streets, the sinister door, the lawyer who suspects everything and says nothing. Read it for the ending, which earns its horror. Read it as a document of what a particular civilization feared about itself. And read it knowing that the dream Stevenson had, the one that became this book, apparently terrified his wife badly enough that she shook him awake — and that his first reaction, according to her, was fury at being woken before it was over.

Further Reading & Resources

Related Works in Our Library