Impact: Great Expectations

The Man Who Wrote Too Much

Charles Dickens was forty-eight years old when he began serializing Great Expectations in his own weekly magazine, All the Year Round, in December 1860. He was not an obscure writer with something to prove. He was the most famous novelist in the English-speaking world, recognized in the streets of London and mobbed on lecture tours in America. He had already written Oliver Twist, David Copperfield, Bleak House, and A Tale of Two Cities. He was, in a word, exhausted.

What makes the biographical context strange and interesting is that Dickens had just come through a period of spectacular personal upheaval. In 1858 he had publicly separated from his wife of twenty-two years, Catherine, in a manner that was widely considered scandalous and cruel — he essentially published a statement in the newspapers blaming her. He was conducting a long affair with a young actress named Ellen Ternan, eighteen years old when they met, which he kept hidden for the rest of his life. And he was worried, for the first time in years, about money: the circulation of All the Year Round had been sagging. He needed a hit.

Dickens had grown up poor in a way that never left him. His father was imprisoned for debt when Charles was twelve, and the boy was sent to work in a boot-blacking factory — pasting labels on pots of shoe polish for six shillings a week. He never got over the shame of it, and he never fully got over the terror that he might end up there again. Great Expectations is, among other things, the novel in which he finally, unflinchingly, looked that shame in the face.

A Serial Hit, Then a Classic

Great Expectations was not a rediscovered masterpiece. It was an immediate sensation. Serialized weekly from December 1860 to August 1861, it reversed the declining readership of All the Year Round almost instantly. Victorian readers devoured it in installments the way audiences today binge television — with the same frustration at cliffhangers, the same feverish speculation about what would happen next. It was published as a three-volume novel in 1861 and sold well in that form too.

The critical reception was strong, though not without reservation. Some reviewers found the plot mechanics too contrived, the coincidences too convenient. They were not wrong about the coincidences — this is a novel where the lawyer who handles Pip's mysterious fortune turns out to also represent the woman who raised Estella, who turns out to be the daughter of the convict who gave Pip the money in the first place. Dickens was not above engineering a small world when the story required it. But readers forgave him, because the emotional truth of the thing hit harder than any structural objection.

One detail that tends to surprise people: Dickens originally wrote a different ending — one where Pip and Estella part permanently, with no romantic reconciliation. His friend and fellow novelist Edward Bulwer-Lytton read the manuscript and told him readers would hate it. Dickens rewrote the ending to leave the door open. For over a century, editors and scholars have argued about which ending is better. The original is probably the more honest one.

What the Book Is Actually About

The plot summary makes Great Expectations sound like a rags-to-riches story: an orphan boy named Pip, raised by his terrifying sister and her gentle husband Joe, is mysteriously elevated to gentleman status by an anonymous benefactor. He moves to London, acquires expensive clothes and useless skills, and falls helplessly in love with the cold and beautiful Estella, who has been raised by the wealthy, half-mad Miss Havisham specifically to break men's hearts. The mystery of who is funding Pip drives the novel forward.

But the book Dickens is actually writing is a sustained attack on the Victorian myth of self-improvement — the idea that wealth ennobles character, that a gentleman is made rather than born, that money washes away the past. Pip spends most of the novel being wrong about what matters. He is ashamed of Joe, who is everything decent and good. He is dazzled by Estella, who cannot love him. He assumes his money comes from Miss Havisham, because that is the story that flatters his vanity. When the truth arrives — that his fortune comes from Magwitch, the convict he helped as a terrified child in a graveyard — it is devastating precisely because it is also clarifying.

There is a version of this novel that could be sentimental or moralistic. Dickens makes it neither. Pip is allowed to be genuinely unlikable for long stretches — vain, class-obsessed, cruel in small ways to the people who love him. His self-knowledge comes slowly and costs him nearly everything. The opening chapter, where the child Pip is held upside down by a desperate man in chains, contains the whole argument: the respectable world and the criminal world are not separate. They are the same world, seen from different angles.

Miss Havisham and the Stopped Clocks

Miss Havisham is one of the most indelible characters in all of English fiction, and Dickens earns her. She is the jilted bride who stopped all the clocks in her house at twenty minutes to nine on the morning she was abandoned at the altar, who still wears the yellowed wedding dress decades later, who has never left the house, who has let the wedding cake rot on the table until it is a ruin of dust and cobwebs and mice. She has raised Estella as a weapon against men, a deliberate instrument of revenge against a sex that hurt her once.

What makes Miss Havisham more than a grotesque is that Dickens gives her a moment of genuine recognition. Late in the novel, she understands what she has done to Estella — not protected her from pain, but made her incapable of love at all. 'What have I done,' she asks, and it is one of the few moments in the book where a character's self-knowledge arrives in time to matter, barely. She is not redeemed, exactly. But she is seen.

The stopped clocks are the most economical symbol Dickens ever invented. Miss Havisham is a person who has refused to let time move, who has built a shrine to a single moment of grief. The novel suggests, with some gentleness, that this is a form of madness available to everyone — not just jilted brides. Pip does it too, in his way. So does the reader who can't stop returning to the moment everything went wrong.

The Cultural Footprint

The title has become a common noun. When journalists write about a young politician with 'great expectations,' or a startup founder whose ambitions outrun his capital, they are using Dickens's phrase to mean something Dickens spent five hundred pages interrogating. The irony has evaporated from the idiom. That is, in a way, the novel's ultimate cultural victory: it named a condition so precisely that we use the name without remembering where it came from.

Great Expectations has been adapted for stage and screen so many times that cataloguing them exhaustively is its own small scholarly industry. The most acclaimed film version is David Lean's 1946 adaptation, which opens with the graveyard scene rendered in stark black-and-white cinematography that perfectly captures the cold terror of Dickens's prose. There have been versions set in modern New York, in post-apartheid South Africa, in contemporary England with Gwyneth Paltrow as a gender-swapped Estella. The story survives transplantation because its engine — a poor boy who mistakes wealth for worth, and has to unlearn everything — is not Victorian. It is perennial.

The novel's influence on later writers is harder to trace precisely because it is everywhere. The DNA of Great Expectations runs through F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby — another story about a self-invented man destroyed by his dream of a woman who represents a class he can never quite reach. It surfaces in countless bildungsromans about class anxiety and social performance. Salman Rushdie has cited Dickens as a formative influence. Alfonso Cuarón's 1998 film adaptation moved the story to Florida and New York and barely changed the emotional architecture at all.

Why It Still Hits

The anxiety at the center of Great Expectations — that your origins define you, that you can never fully escape where you came from, that the identity you've constructed might be exposed as performance at any moment — has not become less relevant in the century and a half since Dickens published it. If anything, in an era of personal branding and LinkedIn profiles and the constant performance of aspirational selfhood, it has become more relevant. Pip is every person who has ever felt like a fraud in a room full of people they are trying to impress.

The prose itself rewards reading at any age. Dickens was a working journalist and a stage performer before he was a novelist, and the sentences in Great Expectations have that quality — economical where they need to be, expansive where they can afford it, always aware of an audience. The opening chapter, from which the excerpt above is drawn, is as perfectly constructed as any opening in the English novel: the orphan boy alone, the graveyard, the convict rising from among the graves, the world turning upside down. It takes Dickens about eight paragraphs to establish everything: the hero's loneliness, the social world he inhabits, the violence simmering beneath it, and the chance encounter that will detonate his entire life.

And then there is Joe Gargery, the blacksmith — Pip's brother-in-law and the only genuinely good man in the novel — who never stops loving Pip even when Pip is too busy being ashamed of him to notice. Joe is Dickens's argument, made in human form, that gentleness and dignity are not the properties of a class. When Pip finally understands this, it is too late to undo the damage, but not too late to matter. That is the kind of reckoning that novels are uniquely built to deliver, and Great Expectations delivers it without flinching.

Further Reading & Resources

Related Works in Our Library