Impact: Common Sense

The Man Who Arrived Just in Time

Thomas Paine was thirty-seven years old and had accomplished almost nothing when he stepped off the boat in Philadelphia in November 1774. His first wife had died in childbirth. His second marriage had collapsed. He had been fired twice from the British excise service — once for asking, politely, for a raise on behalf of himself and his colleagues. He arrived in the colonies half-dead from typhus, carrying little more than Franklin's letter of recommendation and a furious, clear-eyed sense of how power worked.

What made Paine different from most political writers of his era was not his ideas — many of which had been circulating in Enlightenment thought for decades — but his prose. He wrote for people who worked with their hands. He avoided Latin. He used the Bible strategically, not because he was particularly devout (he would later publish The Age of Reason, a deist critique of organized religion that scandalized almost everyone), but because he understood his audience. When he wanted to argue that kings were an absurd institution, he didn't cite Locke. He went to the Book of Samuel, where God himself warns the Israelites that demanding a king is a kind of apostasy. Paine knew that the person he needed to convince was not a Philadelphia lawyer but a Virginia farmer.

He had been in America for barely a year when he sat down to write Common Sense. That outsider velocity — the clarity of someone who had just arrived and could see the situation fresh — is all over the pamphlet.

A Sensation in Ink

Common Sense was published on January 10, 1776, by the Philadelphia printers W. & T. Bradford. Paine refused any royalties, asking only that the proceeds fund mittens for the Continental Army. The first printing of a thousand copies sold out in days. Within three months, it had gone through twenty-five editions across the colonies. By the end of the year, the half-million circulation figure — in a population that included enslaved people, women who had no public political voice, and thousands who could not read — represents a penetration that no modern political book has come close to matching on a per-capita basis.

The reaction was not universally warm. Loyalists were predictably outraged. But more interesting were the ambivalent responses from within the patriot movement itself. John Adams, who agreed with Paine on independence, found the pamphlet's democratic ideals alarming — he thought Paine's vision of government was too egalitarian, too willing to hand power to ordinary people. George Washington, who ordered it read aloud to his troops at Valley Forge, was more enthusiastic. 'I find Common Sense is working a powerful change in the minds of men,' he wrote in a letter in early 1776. For soldiers sleeping in frozen mud, Paine's argument that they were fighting not just a tax dispute but a contest for the future of human freedom was exactly the fuel they needed.

Paine published anonymously — the title page of the first edition simply read 'Written by an Englishman.' The irony that the most compelling argument for American independence had been made by someone who had arrived from England fourteen months earlier was not lost on readers.

What the Pamphlet Actually Argues

It is easy, from a distance of 250 years, to assume that Common Sense was pushing on an open door — that American independence was obvious and inevitable by January 1776. It was not. As late as the winter of 1775-76, the dominant position among colonial leaders was reconciliation with Britain, not separation. Many colonists thought of themselves as Englishmen defending their rights under the English constitution. Paine's genius was to argue that this was precisely the wrong frame.

He begins not with America at all but with government itself — with why governments exist and what makes them legitimate. His opening move is to separate 'society' from 'government,' a distinction that sounds simple but was genuinely radical: society is everything people create together for mutual benefit; government is a 'necessary evil' whose sole job is to prevent us from harming each other. From this foundation, the argument against monarchy follows with almost geometric logic. Hereditary succession is, Paine writes, an absurdity — the idea that wisdom and fitness to rule can be passed from parent to child like a piece of furniture. 'Of more worth is one honest man to society, and in the sight of God,' he writes, 'than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.'

The second half of the pamphlet turns to America specifically, and here Paine makes what was perhaps his most audacious argument: that America's cause was not parochial. 'The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind,' he writes in the introduction, and he means it. He is asking his readers to see their colonial grievance as the opening chapter of something larger — a demonstration that self-governance was possible, that ordinary people could run their own affairs without a hereditary aristocracy to manage them. This is the argument that gave the American Revolution its missionary quality, the sense that it was not just a war but a proof of concept for the rest of the world.

The Lines That Traveled Farthest

Paine had a gift for the sentence that lodges in the brain. 'Time makes more converts than reason,' he writes in the very first paragraph of the introduction — a line that is simultaneously a piece of practical political advice and a quiet admission that he knows his arguments will face resistance. 'A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right.' He is describing monarchy, but he could be describing any entrenched system that survives on inertia rather than merit.

These lines spread because they were quotable in a pre-internet sense: people wrote them in letters, repeated them in taverns, read them aloud from pulpits and town squares. Paine understood that the pamphlet was a form of viral media — short enough to be read in an evening, cheap enough (he kept the price deliberately low) to be passed hand to hand, and written in a voice plain enough that it didn't require a university education to follow. The rhetorical choices were not accidental. They were the calculated decisions of a man who wanted to move a mass audience, and who understood that the enemy of persuasion is condescension.

A Difficult Aftermath

Paine's later life is a story worth knowing, because it complicates any simple narrative about the Founders as a harmonious band of visionaries. After Common Sense, he continued writing — the Crisis papers, published during the darkest phases of the Revolutionary War, kept Continental Army morale from collapsing at several critical moments. ('These are the times that try men's souls' is Paine, not Jefferson.) He then went to France, supported the French Revolution, was imprisoned by Robespierre, and narrowly escaped the guillotine. He published The Rights of Man, which was banned in Britain and for which he was tried in absentia for seditious libel. He published The Age of Reason, which destroyed his reputation in America almost completely — organized religion had more friends than monarchy.

He returned to the United States in 1802, old and ill, to find that most of his former allies wanted nothing to do with him. He died in 1809 in New York City, impoverished and largely friendless. Only six people attended his funeral. His bones were later dug up by an English admirer who planned to give him a proper burial in England; they were subsequently lost. The man who had done as much as anyone to make the United States exist was buried, ultimately, nowhere.

Why It Still Matters

The specific arguments of Common Sense — against hereditary monarchy, for American independence — were settled long ago. What keeps the pamphlet alive is something harder to date: the template it provides for speaking political truth in plain language to a general audience, and the insistence that the legitimacy of any government derives entirely from whether it serves the people living under it.

Every generation finds its own reasons to return to Paine. The early labor movement claimed him. Anti-colonial independence movements around the world in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries cited him. The argument that 'a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right' has been applied, with varying degrees of precision, to nearly every subsequent movement for political change in the democratic tradition. This is what it means for a text to be generative — not that it provides answers, but that it sharpens the questions.

There is also something specifically moving about the circumstances of its composition. Paine wrote Common Sense as a newcomer, an outsider, someone who had failed at almost everything he had previously attempted. He had no political credentials, no family connections, no institutional backing. What he had was the ability to look at a system that everyone around him had grown up accepting and ask, simply: why? That question — asked clearly, in language anyone could understand, at exactly the right moment — turned out to be enough to change the world. It is difficult to read the pamphlet today without feeling the peculiar urgency of that, and wondering what equivalent assumptions we have all grown too comfortable with to examine.

Further Reading & Resources

Related Works in Our Library