Impact: Alcoholics Anonymous — 1955 Second Edition

Who Were Bill Wilson and Dr. Bob Smith

Bill Wilson, known in AA circles simply as Bill W., was a Wall Street speculator whose career dissolved along with his sobriety during the Depression years. By the mid-1930s he was cycling in and out of detox hospitals, declared a hopeless case by the physician who would later write the opening medical opinion in this very book. Dr. Robert Smith — Dr. Bob — was an Akron surgeon who had managed to maintain a medical practice while hiding a decades-long dependence on alcohol. The two men met in 1935, and the conversation they had over the next several hours in Akron is now considered the founding moment of Alcoholics Anonymous.

What made them unusual was not that they had hit bottom — plenty of people had — but that they developed a theory, radical for its time, that one alcoholic could help another in ways that no doctor or clergyman could. The knowledge that someone across the table had been exactly where you are, had felt the same hopeless compulsion, and had found a way through it: that was the therapeutic mechanism. The book they eventually wrote together was an attempt to bottle that conversation and send it out into the world to people who couldn't get to Akron.

A Printing Bill and a Wholesale Miracle

The original 1939 publication of Alcoholics Anonymous was financed partly through the sale of shares to early members — shares in a book that almost no one outside their circle had reason to believe would sell. The works' first real publicity break came when a journalist named Jack Alexander wrote a long, admiring feature for the Saturday Evening Post in 1941. Within weeks, AA's New York office was flooded with thousands of letters from desperate drinkers across the country. The fellowship, which had barely scraped together a hundred members in its first few years, began to grow at a pace that astonished even its founders.

By the time Bill Wilson sat down to write the foreword to this second edition in 1955, the numbers had become almost surreal. From roughly one hundred members at the time of the first printing, AA had grown to more than 150,000 recovered alcoholics in nearly 6,000 groups — not just in the United States, but in the British Isles, Scandinavia, South Africa, South America, Australia, and some fifty other countries and territories. Wilson, with characteristic understatement, called it 'a wholesale miracle.' The phrase is not hyperbole. No grassroots mutual-aid movement in modern history had spread so far so fast with so little institutional machinery behind it.

What the Book Actually Says

Most people who know about the Twelve Steps have never actually read the chapters that explain them. The core of Alcoholics Anonymous — the section Wilson was careful to leave 'largely untouched' in this second edition — is a sustained argument about the nature of addiction that was genuinely ahead of its medical moment. The book insists, in plain language, that alcoholism is a disease of mind and body, not a failure of willpower or a moral deficiency. This was not the consensus view in 1939. Drunkenness was widely regarded as a character flaw; alcoholics were people who simply chose to keep drinking. The book pushed back against that framework with the blunt force of lived experience.

The Twelve Steps themselves are embedded in a narrative voice that is remarkably direct and occasionally startling. The program asks members to take a searching moral inventory of themselves, to acknowledge harm done to others, and to make amends where possible — but it frames all of this not as punishment or penance but as practical housekeeping, the clearing of wreckage that blocks recovery. The spiritual dimension of the steps is real but carefully hedged; the book insists only on belief in 'a Power greater than ourselves,' a formulation deliberately vague enough to accommodate members who had no use for organized religion.

The second half of the book, the personal story section, was substantially revised and expanded for this edition. Where the first edition featured only the stories of its original hundred members — nearly all of them white, middle-class, male, and deep in late-stage alcoholism — the 1955 edition broadened the range deliberately. Women, who had been 'very reluctant to approach A.A.' at first, had come forward in large numbers. Young people were now members. The preface notes that AA had come to reach 'every level of life and into nearly all occupations.' The stories were chosen so that 'every alcoholic reader may find a reflection of him or herself in it.' That logic — that identification, not instruction, is what heals — is the book's deepest premise.

The Medical Establishment and Dr. Silkworth's Opinion

One of the shrewdest decisions in the book's structure was placing a physician's statement right at the front. Dr. William D. Silkworth was the doctor who had treated Bill Wilson at Towns Hospital in New York, a man who had seen thousands of alcoholics cycle through his care with little lasting result. His endorsement of the AA approach — preserved intact in both editions, described in the preface with obvious reverence as coming from 'our Society's great medical benefactor' — gave the book a credibility it could not have generated on its own in 1939.

Silkworth's contribution was also substantive. His 'allergy theory' — the idea that alcoholics have a physical sensitivity to alcohol that produces an abnormal craving once drinking begins — gave the fellowship a medical framework for their experience before addiction medicine had a real vocabulary for it. The theory has been refined and complicated by subsequent research, but its core insight that something is different about how alcoholics process alcohol is now well-supported science. A book written by laypeople, with help from one sympathetic doctor, anticipated decades of research.

The Cultural Footprint

The phrase 'one day at a time' is now so embedded in the English language that most people who use it have no idea where it comes from. The same is true of 'hitting rock bottom,' the 'higher power,' and the very concept of a twelve-step program. AA's framework has been adapted — sometimes faithfully, sometimes loosely — for gambling addiction, overeating, narcotics, and dozens of other compulsive behaviors. There are now hundreds of twelve-step organizations worldwide, all descended from the template laid out in this book. Alcoholics Anonymous may be the most extensively imitated self-help text ever written.

Its influence on literature and film has been quieter but real. The confessional memoir as a genre — the first-person account of addiction and recovery that has become a reliable literary form — owes its basic architecture to the personal stories section of the Big Book. Writers from Charles Jackson, whose The Lost Weekend appeared just five years after the first edition, to contemporary memoirists working in the recovery tradition are in some sense writing in the shadow of those original hundred stories. The model of honest public testimony about one's own destruction and reconstruction, once a radical act, is now simply a genre.

Why It Still Matters

The critics of AA are real and their points are fair. The program's effectiveness varies widely depending on how it is studied and measured. Its spiritual framework does not work for everyone, and the alternatives — secular recovery programs, medication-assisted treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy — have expanded significantly since 1939. The Big Book's understanding of alcoholism, written before modern neuroscience, is in some places dated.

And yet. The book's core observation — that shame and secrecy make addiction worse, that community and honest self-examination can make it better, that a person who has been through something can help another person in ways that no expert quite can — has held up. The anonymity that the original foreword requested to protect a small, fragile fellowship has evolved into a cultural norm that allows millions of people to seek help without attaching their names to a stigmatized disease. The insistence that there are 'no fees or dues' and that the only requirement for membership is 'an honest desire to stop drinking' created a form of mutual aid with essentially no barrier to entry.

What you are reading when you read Alcoholics Anonymous is a document written by people who had been told their situation was hopeless, who decided to write down exactly what had worked for them, and who then tried to give it away to anyone who needed it. It is, at its core, a very American kind of optimism — stubborn, practical, unsentimental, and, in the evidence of the numbers, not wrong.

Further Reading & Resources

Related Works in Our Library