Impact: The Bhagavad Gita

The Poem Inside the Epic

The Bhagavad Gita is not a freestanding book in the way Western readers expect. It is, as Arnold puts it in his preface, "an episode of the Mahabharata," embedded in the sixth, or "Bhishma," section of an epic so vast it dwarfs the Iliad and Odyssey combined. The setting is impossibly specific and impossibly grand at once. Arnold locates it on "the level country between the Jumna and the Sarsooti rivers," real geography, where two armies — the Kauravas and the Pandavas, cousins turned enemies — are drawn up for slaughter.

And then the action stops. The prince Arjuna, looking across the field at relatives, teachers, and friends he is about to kill, simply refuses. The entire poem unfolds in that frozen moment: a dialogue "maintained in a war-chariot drawn up between the opposing hosts." His charioteer answers his despair, and the answers keep climbing — from battlefield ethics to the nature of action, the soul, and finally the structure of reality itself. The charioteer, of course, is Krishna, "the Supreme Deity, wearing the disguise of a charioteer." The most famous spiritual text in India is, structurally, a man talking himself out of a panic attack with the help of his driver.

Who Was Edwin Arnold

Arnold was a Victorian journalist and poet who became, improbably, one of the great popularizers of Eastern religion for English readers. He had spent years in India as principal of a college in Poona, and he came to the Gita already steeped in the subcontinent's languages and texts. His preface signs off with the colonial letters of his era — "C.S.I.," Companion of the Star of India — and the whole enterprise carries the complicated freight of a British administrator translating the sacred literature of a country Britain ruled.

But Arnold's affection was real and unembarrassed. His dedication is addressed plainly "TO INDIA," and he writes that he has rendered the poem's "hidden mystery, / For England; O our India! as dear to me as She!" He had already scored an enormous popular success with The Light of Asia, a verse life of the Buddha. The Gita was his attempt to do the same service for Hindu philosophy — to take something "so dear to India" and give it, as he says, a "popular form" the West could actually read.

Why He Translated It in Verse

Arnold was not the first to bring the Gita into Europe — far from it. He cheerfully lists his predecessors: the poem had already been "turned into French by Burnouf, into Latin by Lassen, into Italian by Stanislav Gatti, into Greek by Galanos," and into English prose by Thomson and Davies. He even praises a rival English version as "truly beyond praise for its fidelity and clearness." So why add another?

His answer is essentially aesthetic. The scholarly translations were accurate but flat; they did not sing. The original is composed in the tight Anushtubh metre, which Arnold concedes "cannot be successfully reproduced for Western ears," so he recast the whole thing into English blank verse, shifting "into lyrical measures" wherever the Sanskrit itself breaks into song. The result trades a measure of literal precision for music and dignity — Arnold believed "English literature would certainly be incomplete" without a version that conveyed the poem's grace, not just its meaning. He is also disarmingly honest about the limits of the project, quoting the great scholar Schlegel's admission that even he could not always swear he had "rightly divined the poet's mind" in the more obscure passages.

The Christianity Question

One of the strangest features of the Gita's Western reception is a genuine scholarly brawl over whether it borrowed from the Gospels — or the other way around. Arnold reports it directly. Some of the poem's moral teachings run so close to the New Testament, with parallels "ofttimes actually verbal," that "a controversy has arisen between Pandits and Missionaries" over which way the influence flowed: whether the Gita's author drew on Christian sources, or "the Evangelists and Apostles" drew on him.

The dating is genuinely unsettled. Arnold notes that one scholar, Telang, argued the poem predates the Christian era entirely, while "the weight of evidence" in his day placed it around the third century after Christ. Arnold floats the tantalizing possibility that there are "really echoes in this Brahmanic poem of the lessons of Galilee." Modern scholarship leans toward an older date, but the episode captures something true: when nineteenth-century Europeans first read the Gita, they could not quite believe a non-Christian text could sound so much like their own scripture.

What the Poem Is Really About

At its heart, the Gita answers a question almost everyone faces in some form: how do you act when every choice seems wrong? Arjuna's paralysis is the human condition dramatized at maximum stakes. Krishna's reply — the doctrine the poem is most famous for — is that one should act according to one's duty without grasping at the fruits of action, performing the work itself selflessly and surrendering attachment to its outcome.

Arnold describes the poem as unfolding "a philosophical system" in "plain but noble language," one "blending as it does the doctrines of Kapila, Patanjali, and the Vedas" — meaning it gathers up several strands of Indian thought, including the discipline that became yoga, into a single coherent vision. What makes it endure is that the philosophy never floats free of the human drama. The cosmic teaching is delivered to a specific frightened man on a specific terrible morning, and that grounding keeps the abstractions breathing. Arnold was right to call its declarations "lofty," its aspirations "sublime," its piety "pure and tender."

The Footprint

The Gita's reach in the modern world is hard to overstate, and Arnold's accessible verse was one of the doors through which it traveled. Mahatma Gandhi treated the poem as a daily spiritual guide and a manual for action without attachment. American transcendentalists like Emerson and Thoreau pored over early translations, and the poem became a touchstone of nineteenth-century Western interest in Eastern thought. In the twentieth century it surfaced in the most unexpected places — physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer famously reached for the Gita's vision of cosmic destruction when he watched the first atomic bomb detonate.

Arnold himself was clear about his ambition. He notes the poem "enjoys immense popularity and authority in India," where it ranks among the "Five Jewels" of the literature, and his stated goal was simply to give that beloved poem a "popular form" in English. He succeeded so well that for generations of English-speaking readers, The Song Celestial simply was the Bhagavad Gita.

Reading It Now

A modern reader should come to Arnold's Gita with two things in mind. First, it is a translation with a temperature — warm, ornate, unmistakably Victorian, more interested in beauty than in scholarly exactness. Read it for the music and the sweep, and consult a plainer prose version if you want to pin down the philosophy precisely. Second, it is a colonial artifact, an Englishman's loving but situated rendering of a sacred text from a country his nation governed. Both things are true and both are worth holding.

What survives all of that is the poem itself: the oldest and most durable insight that the moment before you act is the moment that defines you. Arjuna's question on the chariot is not an antique curiosity. It is the question of anyone caught between competing duties, terrified of the consequences of doing the right thing. The Gita's answer has steadied minds for nearly two thousand years, and Arnold's verse remains one of the most beautiful ways to hear it in English.

Further Reading & Resources

Related Works in Our Library